Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-330
67 Imaging
37 Features
52 Overall
43
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 520g - 124 x 80 x 95mm
- Introduced September 2010
- Later Model is Leica V-Lux 3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
Photography Glossary Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Leica V-Lux 2 versus Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the V-Lux 2 (14MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe V-Lux 2 was revealed 4 months earlier than the VR-330 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Leica V-Lux 2 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the V-Lux 2 matches up vs the VR-330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica V-Lux 2 and Olympus VR-330. The full galleries are viewable at Leica V-Lux 2 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 2 over the Olympus VR-330
| V-Lux 2 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Leica V-Lux 2
| VR-330 | V-Lux 2 |
|---|
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 2 and Olympus VR-330
| V-Lux 2 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 |  | February 2011 | Same generation |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical display resolution |
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Leica V-Lux 2 comes with outer measurements of 124mm x 80mm x 95mm (4.9" x 3.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 520 grams (1.15 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Leica V-Lux 2 versus Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the V-Lux 2 against the VR-330.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the V-Lux 2 and VR-330 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The visual below may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the V-Lux 2 and VR-330.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of files although you should always consider the release date of the cameras into account.
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Leica V-Lux 2 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica V-Lux 2 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-09-21 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.2 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | AVCHD Lite | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 520 grams (1.15 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 80 x 95mm (4.9" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $1,000 | $220 |