Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB350F
67 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 540g - 124 x 81 x 95mm
- Launched December 2011
- Older Model is Leica V-Lux 2
- Renewed by Leica V-Lux 4
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Leica V-Lux 3 versus Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Leica and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the V-Lux 3 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe V-Lux 3 was revealed 3 years before the WB350F which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Leica V-Lux 3 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the V-Lux 3 grades versus the WB350F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica V-Lux 3 and Samsung WB350F. The full galleries are available at Leica V-Lux 3 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 3 over the Samsung WB350F
| V-Lux 3 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Leica V-Lux 3
| WB350F | V-Lux 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 | December 2011 | Newer by 25 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 3 and Samsung WB350F
| V-Lux 3 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Leica V-Lux 3 features outer measurements of 124mm x 81mm x 95mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.7") and a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Leica V-Lux 3 versus Samsung WB350F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the V-Lux 3 against the WB350F.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the V-Lux 3 and WB350F is 67 and 90 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching technical specs. The image below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the V-Lux 3 and WB350F.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB350F to render greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged V-Lux 3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Leica V-Lux 3 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Samsung |
| Model type | Leica V-Lux 3 | Samsung WB350F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-12-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 23 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.2 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540 gr (1.19 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 81 x 95mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.7") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 410 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BP-DC 9 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $949 | $260 |