Leica V-Lux 3 vs Sony HX300
67 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 540g - 124 x 81 x 95mm
- Revealed December 2011
- Replaced the Leica V-Lux 2
- Updated by Leica V-Lux 4
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Released February 2013
- Previous Model is Sony HX200V
- Replacement is Sony HX400V
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Leica V-Lux 3 versus Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Leica and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the V-Lux 3 (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe V-Lux 3 was announced 14 months prior to the HX300 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the V-Lux 3 matches up versus the HX300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica V-Lux 3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica V-Lux 3 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 3 over the Sony HX300
V-Lux 3 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Leica V-Lux 3
HX300 | V-Lux 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2013 | December 2011 | Newer by 14 months | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 461k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 3 and Sony HX300
V-Lux 3 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Leica V-Lux 3 provides outside dimensions of 124mm x 81mm x 95mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.7") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has dimensions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check the Leica V-Lux 3 versus Sony HX300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the V-Lux 3 against the HX300.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the V-Lux 3 and HX300 is 67 and 63 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The picture below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the V-Lux 3 and HX300.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Sony HX300 to deliver greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged V-Lux 3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Leica V-Lux 3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Sony |
Model | Leica V-Lux 3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-12-08 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.2 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 540g (1.19 lb) | 623g (1.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 81 x 95mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.7") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BP-DC 9 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $949 | $339 |