Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320
65 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69bbd/69bbda441cf69bb45760b2094903e098ebad2393" alt="Leica V-Lux 4 front Leica V-Lux 4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Revealed September 2012
- Previous Model is Leica V-Lux 3
- Later Model is Leica V-Lux 5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the V-Lux 4 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The V-Lux 4 was introduced 15 months after the VR-320 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Leica V-Lux 4 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the V-Lux 4 scores against the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica V-Lux 4 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are provided at Leica V-Lux 4 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 4 over the Olympus VR-320
V-Lux 4 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 15 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Leica V-Lux 4
VR-320 | V-Lux 4 |
---|
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 4 and Olympus VR-320
V-Lux 4 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Leica V-Lux 4 comes with external measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the V-Lux 4 compared to the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46290/4629035d9fbff5e5089716e3086572dd427391c4" alt="Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the V-Lux 4 and VR-320 is 65 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61d39/61d3914cafb8361a0151418c4346da73df4d0490" alt="Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading specifications. The picture here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the V-Lux 4 and VR-320.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to deliver extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The younger V-Lux 4 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da206/da206dc3e0024d642708d64264391baa2cccd51c" alt="Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eee29/eee29d674b42dfd71cb69fed7c7e455ed3c20321" alt="Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Leica V-Lux 4 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica V-Lux 4 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,312k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.50 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 588 grams (1.30 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 540 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $899 | $179 |