Nikon A1000 vs Olympus XZ-1
86 Imaging
42 Features
64 Overall
50
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 330g - 114 x 72 x 41mm
- Launched January 2019
- Older Model is Nikon A900
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Nikon A1000 versus Olympus XZ-1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the A1000 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the A1000 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") possess totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe A1000 was launched 8 years after the XZ-1 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the A1000 scores vs the XZ-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix A1000 and Olympus XZ-1. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon A1000 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A1000 over the Olympus XZ-1
A1000 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2019 | January 2011 | Newer by 98 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 614k | Clearer screen (+307k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Nikon A1000
XZ-1 | A1000 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon A1000 and Olympus XZ-1
A1000 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size |
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon A1000 has got outer measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Nikon A1000 versus Olympus XZ-1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the A1000 against the XZ-1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A1000 and XZ-1 is 86 and 88 respectively.
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The picture here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the A1000 and XZ-1.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The A1000 due to its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Nikon A1000 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger A1000 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix A1000 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix A1000 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2019-01-18 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 921k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,166k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | EN-EL12 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | No | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 330g (0.73 lbs) | 275g (0.61 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 images | 320 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $477 | $567 |