Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VG-160

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus VG-160 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • New Model is Olympus E-410
Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus VG-160, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-400 was introduced 6 years earlier than the VG-160 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-400 grades against the VG-160 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus VG-160

 E-400 VG-160 
Manually focus More accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-400

 VG-160 E-400 
LaunchedJanuary 2012September 2006More recent by 64 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k215kCrisper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus VG-160

 E-400 VG-160 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 comes with outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus VG-160 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-400 and the VG-160.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and VG-160 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and VG-160.

As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-400 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus VG-160 will provide greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography advice
Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography advice
46
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
manual exposure not possible
megapixel count low (10MP)
33
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VG-160 as a Street photography camera
60
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
56
lighter than average (125g)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography advice
Olympus VG-160 Sports photography advice
38
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
26
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (165 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography features
Olympus VG-160 Travel photography features
49
built-in flash
no Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
65
lighter than average (125g)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse recording
not so great battery (165 per charge)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography info
Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography info
45
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
no Timelapse mode
36
reasonably wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
not so great battery (165 shots)
no Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging features
Olympus VG-160 Vlogging features
9
can't shoot video
30
reasonably wide (26mm)
has face detection focusing
lighter than average (125 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus VG-160
 Olympus E-400Olympus VG-160
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-400 Olympus VG-160
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2006-09-14 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus distance - 7cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.80 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lbs) 125 gr (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 165 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $599 $90