Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5020
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Refreshed by Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also referred to as X-935
Photography Glossary Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Nikon A900 and Olympus FE-5020, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A900 was announced 6 years after the FE-5020 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the A900 scores vs the FE-5020 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Olympus FE-5020. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus FE-5020
| A900 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 81 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Nikon A900
| FE-5020 | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus FE-5020
| A900 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon A900 features outside dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5020 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
See the Nikon A900 and Olympus FE-5020 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the A900 compared to the FE-5020.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and FE-5020 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The pic here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the A900 and FE-5020.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon A900 to offer you more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher A900 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Also called | - | X-935 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lbs) | 137 grams (0.30 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $400 | $160 |