Clicky

Nikon A900 vs Olympus 7040

Portability
88
Imaging
46
Features
58
Overall
50
Nikon Coolpix A900 front
 
Olympus Stylus 7040 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
31
Overall
34

Nikon A900 vs Olympus 7040 Key Specs

Nikon A900
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
  • 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
  • Announced February 2016
  • Replacement is Nikon A1000
Olympus 7040
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
  • Introduced January 2010
  • Other Name is mju 7040
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Nikon A900 vs Olympus 7040 Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Nikon A900 versus Olympus 7040, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and 7040 (14MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The A900 was unveiled 6 years later than the 7040 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the A900 scores vs the 7040 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus 7040

 A900 7040 
IntroducedFebruary 2016January 2010More recent by 75 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution921k230kCrisper screen (+691k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Nikon A900

 7040 A900 

Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus 7040

 A900 7040 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Nikon A900 vs Olympus 7040 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon A900 comes with exterior measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7040 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check out the Nikon A900 versus Olympus 7040 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the A900 vs the 7040.

Nikon A900 vs Olympus 7040 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and 7040 is 88 and 95 respectively.

Nikon A900 vs Olympus 7040 top view buttons comparison

Nikon A900 vs Olympus 7040 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The graphic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the A900 and 7040.

All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should expect the Nikon A900 to give greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent A900 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.

Nikon A900 vs Olympus 7040 sensor size comparison

Nikon A900 vs Olympus 7040 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon A900 vs Olympus 7040 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Nikon A900
Portrait photography with Olympus 7040
40
good megapixels (20MP)
has face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Nikon A900 Street photography info
Olympus 7040 Street photography info
69
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (289 grams)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Nikon A900 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 7040 as a Sports photography camera
56
incredible zoom range (24-840mm 35.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (20MP)
has tracking focus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
39
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
offers tracking autofocus
low fps (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Nikon A900 Travel photography advice
Olympus 7040 Travel photography advice
74
lighter than average in class (289 grams)
has bluetooth
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
great reach (840mm)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.4)
65
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Nikon A900 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus 7040 Landscape photography highlights
49
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (20MP)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
42
really wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon A900 Vlogging advice
Olympus 7040 Vlogging advice
34
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
lighter than average in class (289 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
display is not selfie friendly
no mic support
29
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Nikon A900 vs Olympus 7040 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon A900 and Olympus 7040
 Nikon Coolpix A900Olympus Stylus 7040
General Information
Manufacturer Nikon Olympus
Model Nikon Coolpix A900 Olympus Stylus 7040
Otherwise known as - mju 7040
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2016-02-23 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-840mm (35.0x) 28-196mm (7.0x)
Max aperture f/3.4-6.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 2cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 921k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 7.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) 5.70 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 289 gr (0.64 pounds) 144 gr (0.32 pounds)
Dimensions 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model EN-EL12 -
Self timer Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $400 $299