Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-810
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Newer Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced August 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-810, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and TG-810 (14MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A900 was unveiled 4 years after the TG-810 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the A900 scores versus the TG-810 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Olympus TG-810. The full galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus TG-810
| A900 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | August 2011 | Newer by 56 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Nikon A900
| TG-810 | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-810
| A900 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon A900 provides outside dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-810 has proportions of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-810 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the A900 versus the TG-810.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the A900 and TG-810 is 88 and 92 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at specifications. The picture here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and TG-810.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Nikon A900 to give you more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger A900 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 921k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lbs) | 215 grams (0.47 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 220 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $400 | $428 |