Nikon A900 vs Olympus VH-410
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Nikon A900 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Replacement is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
Photography Glossary Nikon A900 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Nikon A900 vs Olympus VH-410, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe A900 was unveiled 3 years after the VH-410 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the A900 scores vs the VH-410 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon A900 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Olympus VH-410. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon A900 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus VH-410
| A900 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | August 2012 | More modern by 43 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Nikon A900
| VH-410 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus VH-410
| A900 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Nikon A900 comes with exterior measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Olympus VH-410 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Nikon A900 vs Olympus VH-410 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the A900 against the VH-410.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and VH-410 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the A900 and VH-410.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon A900 to resolve greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent A900 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon A900 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus VH-410 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus VH-410 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 pounds) | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $186 |