Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63bd5/63bd549202ff236b9bc86cddba608e6a029457e0" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the WG-1 GPS (14MP) is fairly well matched but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL9 was revealed 6 years after the WG-1 GPS which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-PL9 matches up versus the WG-1 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-PL9 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 79 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus E-PL9
WG-1 GPS | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-PL9 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 comes with outer dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 GPS has sizing of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PL9 versus the WG-1 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08494/08494f18a7ce9f3ca65f115ea7070f163c8009e2" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and WG-1 GPS is 85 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22dc4/22dc4a43b436129afb88b78883163dcd87ad79bf" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through specifications. The pic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and WG-1 GPS.
To sum up, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL9 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will give you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger E-PL9 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca37d/ca37d05b037964805f1c6d66785a623a577c396d" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee7b2/ee7b26181c6549a4143ae3a60160ea1d2eafe73c" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2018-02-08 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 260 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $599 | $350 |