Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ10W
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Launched February 2016
- Replacement is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Also referred to as WB500
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ10W, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and HZ10W (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A900 was brought out 6 years after the HZ10W which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the A900 scores vs the HZ10W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Samsung HZ10W. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon A900 Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung HZ10W
A900 | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | May 2009 | More modern by 83 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Nikon A900
HZ10W | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung HZ10W
A900 | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon A900 provides physical dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Samsung HZ10W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ10W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the A900 versus the HZ10W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and HZ10W is 88 and 90 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and HZ10W.
Clearly, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Nikon A900 to provide you with more detail having its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern A900 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung HZ10W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung HZ10W |
Also called as | - | WB500 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2432 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 921k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289g (0.64 pounds) | 249g (0.55 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $400 | $300 |