Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
92 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60f38/60f3848a1575da76149798298eda7f41157f9cf2" alt="Nikon Coolpix AW110 front Nikon Coolpix AW110 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.8) lens
- 193g - 110 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched July 2013
- Succeeded the Nikon AW100
- New Model is Nikon AW120
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Nikon AW110 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the AW110 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the AW110 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The AW110 was manufactured 7 months after the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the AW110 matches up versus the XZ-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix AW110 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Nikon AW110 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon AW110 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
AW110 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2013 | ![]() | December 2012 | More modern by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon AW110
XZ-2 iHS | AW110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 614k | Crisper screen (+306k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon AW110 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
AW110 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon AW110 offers outer dimensions of 110mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon AW110 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the AW110 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c2c9/4c2c99654ce23eef16d296dc362958d0fc8a8cf3" alt="Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the AW110 and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7b65/d7b65c2ce1fab598525542b29e4b82cd963a9717" alt="Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at specifications. The image here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the AW110 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The AW110 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Nikon AW110 will give you greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent AW110 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bae1b/bae1b15dd016aefcec6b37b32d5d668b9c874d21" alt="Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f16ca/f16ca4bdc81a731eb85f611fb72181a2afd64b9b" alt="Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Nikon AW110 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix AW110 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix AW110 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-07-05 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 614k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 65 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photos | 340 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $250 | $450 |