Nikon AW110 vs Ricoh CX2
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Nikon AW110 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.8) lens
- 193g - 110 x 65 x 25mm
- Announced July 2013
- Old Model is Nikon AW100
- Replacement is Nikon AW120
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon AW110 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Nikon AW110 vs Ricoh CX2, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Nikon and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the AW110 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe AW110 was launched 3 years after the CX2 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the AW110 matches up against the CX2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon AW110 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix AW110 & Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon AW110 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon AW110 over the Ricoh CX2
| AW110 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Nikon AW110
| CX2 | AW110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 614k | Sharper display (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon AW110 and Ricoh CX2
| AW110 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Nikon AW110 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon AW110 enjoys external measurements of 110mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon AW110 vs Ricoh CX2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the AW110 vs the CX2.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the AW110 and CX2 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Nikon AW110 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The image underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the AW110 and CX2.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Nikon AW110 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent AW110 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon AW110 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon AW110 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix AW110 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix AW110 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-07-05 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | OLED monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 185 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 65 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $250 | $341 |