Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F
65 Imaging
46 Features
64 Overall
53
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e199d/e199dafcbdbc8cbf95fde50c6ebcabe49d999591" alt="Nikon Coolpix B700 front Nikon Coolpix B700 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/999d5/999d5267cbeeded12e1c296ab2c2e623b4be3f06" alt="Samsung WB150F front Samsung WB150F front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-1440mm (F3.3-6.5) lens
- 565g - 125 x 85 x 107mm
- Revealed February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Nikon and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the B700 (20MP) and WB150F (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The B700 was brought out 4 years later than the WB150F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Nikon B700 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the B700 scores vs the WB150F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix B700 & Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are available at Nikon B700 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon B700 over the Samsung WB150F
B700 | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 51 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Nikon B700
WB150F | B700 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon B700 and Samsung WB150F
B700 | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Nikon B700 comes with outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 107mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.2") accompanied by a weight of 565 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the B700 compared to the WB150F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d91d/8d91de2697e2789a0e9dc8787511fe210e97da2d" alt="Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the B700 and WB150F is 65 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/974de/974de16f5d7422ba6a5a5c30ab18394f7556e12b" alt="Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison"
Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The graphic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the B700 and WB150F.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Nikon B700 to provide greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer B700 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3b6c/c3b6c02faba765217a1415d36fe048a2b05c99cb" alt="Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison"
Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46818/46818cd20184754bc14b9253358b9c4b8a87a731" alt="Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Nikon B700 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Nikon Coolpix B700 | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Samsung |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix B700 | Samsung WB150F |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1440mm (60.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 921 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 565 grams (1.25 lbs) | 188 grams (0.41 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 107mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.2") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL23 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $500 | $230 |