Nikon P300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
92 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon P300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 189g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2011
- Updated by Nikon P310
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Nikon P300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Nikon P300 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the P300 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable but the P300 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe P300 was announced 18 months earlier than the XZ-2 iHS which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the P300 scores against the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon P300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P300 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Nikon P300 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
P300 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 922k | 920k | Crisper screen (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon P300
XZ-2 iHS | P300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | May 2011 | More recent by 18 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon P300 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
P300 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Nikon P300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon P300 features exterior measurements of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon P300 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the P300 and the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the P300 and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
Nikon P300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the P300 and XZ-2 iHS.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact MP albeit different sensor measurements. The P300 comes with the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field trickier. The older P300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon P300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P300 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P300 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-05-31 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-100mm (4.2x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.50 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30fps), 1280 x 720p (15, 30, 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 189 grams (0.42 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | 340 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $500 | $450 |