Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
92 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 189g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2011
- Updated by Nikon P310
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the P300 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe P300 was launched 4 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the P300 grades versus the WG-5 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P300 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are available at Nikon P300 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P300 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| P300 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Nikon P300
| WG-5 GPS | P300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | May 2011 | More modern by 45 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Nikon P300 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| P300 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon P300 has external dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the P300 compared to the WG-5 GPS.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the P300 and WG-5 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The image underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the P300 and WG-5 GPS.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to give greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged P300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P300 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P300 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-05-31 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 160 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-100mm (4.2x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 14.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30fps), 1280 x 720p (15, 30, 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 189g (0.42 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | 240 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $500 |