Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is very well matched but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PL3 was brought out 20 months after the SP-800 UZ making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-PL3 grades vs the SP-800 UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL3 and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-PL3 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 20 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-PL3
SP-800 UZ | E-PL3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-PL3 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL3 features outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PL3 versus the SP-800 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8f12/d8f1210da232ba67c7a7673de363cfefe7a03a7d" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL3 and SP-800 UZ is 88 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddd19/ddd19dae10af4cd14150cbf382d4ee29b7136a54" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The picture here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL3 and SP-800 UZ.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL3 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will give you more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The newer E-PL3 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1c84/d1c84fa4a29aa874982ac7aac04fad06ae0a6856" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f32c/8f32c3067a28c8f434afc4c99435d13cab9c97e0" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-09-20 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 1000 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 12 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 lbs) | 455g (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $399 | $270 |