Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 189g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Announced May 2011
- Later Model is Nikon P310
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Ricoh. The resolution of the P300 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe P300 was manufactured 4 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the P300 grades against the WG-M1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P300 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon P300 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P300 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| P300 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Nikon P300
| WG-M1 | P300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | May 2011 | More modern by 40 months |
Common features in the Nikon P300 and Ricoh WG-M1
| P300 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon P300 enjoys exterior dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the P300 versus the WG-M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the P300 and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out specs. The image here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the P300 and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-M1 to show more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged P300 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon P300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P300 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P300 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-05-31 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-100mm (4.2x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30fps), 1280 x 720p (15, 30, 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 189g (0.42 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 350 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $500 | $2,000 |