Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000
92 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78c66/78c66be4c5ebba7bc9763e64e675f7a02c9cdd78" alt="Nikon Coolpix P310 front Nikon Coolpix P310 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 194g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Released June 2012
- Replaced the Nikon P300
- Refreshed by Nikon P330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the P310 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The P310 was revealed 3 years later than the 9000 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the P310 matches up versus the 9000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P310 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The full galleries are available at Nikon P310 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P310 over the Olympus 9000
P310 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2012 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 38 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Nikon P310
9000 | P310 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P310 and Olympus 9000
P310 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon P310 offers physical dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the P310 versus the 9000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e80b/5e80b3b1ca034ee6f540664424832fadd45ecb24" alt="Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the P310 and 9000 is 92 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfa6c/cfa6c3fb86d9caa4466847f47853aadfefd93a7e" alt="Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the P310 and 9000.
As you can see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Nikon P310 to deliver greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger P310 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e48d7/e48d7bb4961de0e6bd3d7440e2c25c61b25d018b" alt="Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison"
Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0d88/b0d881bb9837d9940906b12297ca98ab8359c155" alt="Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Nikon P310 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P310 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix P310 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju 9000 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-06-22 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 99 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-100mm (4.2x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $700 | $300 |