Nikon P310 vs Samsung WB250F
92 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Nikon P310 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 194g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Launched June 2012
- Replaced the Nikon P300
- Successor is Nikon P330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon P310 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Nikon P310 and Samsung WB250F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Nikon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the P310 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe P310 was launched 6 months earlier than the WB250F so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the P310 matches up versus the WB250F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon P310 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P310 & Samsung WB250F. The complete galleries are available at Nikon P310 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P310 over the Samsung WB250F
| P310 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Nikon P310
| WB250F | P310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon P310 and Samsung WB250F
| P310 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2012 | January 2013 | Similar age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Nikon P310 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon P310 has got physical dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Nikon P310 and Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the P310 against the WB250F.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the P310 and WB250F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Nikon P310 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the P310 and WB250F.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Nikon P310 to offer greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively.
Nikon P310 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon P310 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P310 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P310 | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-06-22 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-100mm (4.2x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $700 | $250 |