Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-320
92 Imaging
36 Features
48 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F1.8-5.6) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Launched March 2013
- Old Model is Nikon P310
- Later Model is Nikon P340
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Nikon P330 versus Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the P330 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively close but the P330 (1/1.7") and TG-320 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe P330 was manufactured 14 months later than the TG-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the P330 matches up versus the TG-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P330 & Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are available at Nikon P330 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P330 over the Olympus TG-320
| P330 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2013 | January 2012 | More recent by 14 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Nikon P330
| TG-320 | P330 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P330 and Olympus TG-320
| P330 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Nikon P330 has physical measurements of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Nikon P330 versus Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the P330 and the TG-320.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the P330 and TG-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the P330 and TG-320.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The P330 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-320 will render greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher P330 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P330 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P330 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-03-04 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-5.6 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720p (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 200 gr (0.44 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 213 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photos | 150 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $0 |