Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-4
92 Imaging
36 Features
48 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F1.8-5.6) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Released March 2013
- Replaced the Nikon P310
- Renewed by Nikon P340
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- Renewed by Olympus TG-5
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Nikon P330 and Olympus TG-4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the P330 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the P330 (1/1.7") and TG-4 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe P330 was manufactured 3 years before the TG-4 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the P330 grades vs the TG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P330 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon P330 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P330 over the Olympus TG-4
| P330 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Nikon P330
| TG-4 | P330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 | March 2013 | Newer by 25 months |
Common features in the Nikon P330 and Olympus TG-4
| P330 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon P330 has external measurements of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Nikon P330 and Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the P330 versus the TG-4.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the P330 and TG-4 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The image here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the P330 and TG-4.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The P330 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-4 will deliver greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged P330 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P330 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix P330 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-03-04 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 921k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.50 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720p (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 200 grams (0.44 lb) | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 213 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | 380 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $500 | $379 |