Nikon P520 vs Panasonic ZS5
66 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
92 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Nikon P520 vs Panasonic ZS5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1000mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 550g - 125 x 84 x 102mm
- Launched January 2013
- Replaced the Nikon P510
- Newer Model is Nikon P530
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 214g - 103 x 60 x 32mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ8
Photography Glossary Nikon P520 vs Panasonic ZS5 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Nikon P520 vs Panasonic ZS5, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the P520 (18MP) and ZS5 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe P520 was launched 2 years after the ZS5 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Nikon P520 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS5 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the P520 matches up against the ZS5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon P520 vs Panasonic ZS5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P520 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon P520 Gallery and Panasonic ZS5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P520 over the Panasonic ZS5
| P520 | ZS5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | June 2010 | More modern by 32 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display dimensions | 3.2" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS5 over the Nikon P520
| ZS5 | P520 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P520 and Panasonic ZS5
| P520 | ZS5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Nikon P520 vs Panasonic ZS5 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Nikon P520 features outer dimensions of 125mm x 84mm x 102mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.0") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS5 has specifications of 103mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check out the Nikon P520 vs Panasonic ZS5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the P520 versus the ZS5.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the P520 and ZS5 is 66 and 92 respectively.
Nikon P520 vs Panasonic ZS5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The pic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the P520 and ZS5.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Nikon P520 to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern P520 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon P520 vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon P520 vs Panasonic ZS5 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ8 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1000mm (41.7x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.2" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.30 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 550 gr (1.21 pounds) | 214 gr (0.47 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 84 x 102mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.0") | 103 x 60 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL5 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $380 | $300 |