Nikon P520 vs Sony H400
Portability
66 Imaging
42 Features
51 Overall
45
66 Imaging
42 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Nikon P520 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
Nikon P520
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1000mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 550g - 125 x 84 x 102mm
- Released January 2013
- Replaced the Nikon P510
- Successor is Nikon P530
Sony H400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Announced February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon P520 vs Sony H400 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Nikon P520 vs Sony H400, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Nikon and Sony. The resolution of the P520 (18MP) and the H400 (20MP) is fairly close and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe P520 was launched 12 months earlier than the H400 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the P520 scores versus the H400 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon P520 vs Sony H400 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P520 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon P520 Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P520 over the Sony H400
| P520 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display sizing | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Nikon P520
| H400 | P520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Nikon P520 and Sony H400
| P520 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Nikon P520 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon P520 provides outer dimensions of 125mm x 84mm x 102mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.0") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Sony H400 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") along with a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P520 vs Sony H400 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the P520 against the H400.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the P520 and H400 is 66 and 62 respectively.
Nikon P520 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing a spec sheet. The picture below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the P520 and H400.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Sony H400 to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged P520 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Nikon P520 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Nikon P520 Portrait photography factors
Sony H400 Portrait photography factors
manual focus
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsStreet Comparison
Nikon P520 as a Street photography camera
Sony H400 as a Street photography camera
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than competitors in class (550 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (628 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Nikon P520 Sports photography advice
Sony H400 Sports photography advice
great zoom range (24-1000mm 41.7 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (200 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
great zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Nikon P520 as a Travel photography camera
Sony H400 as a Travel photography camera
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (1000mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
not so great battery power (200 CIPA)
more heavy than competitors in class (550 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
megapixel count good (20MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
long reach (1550mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (628g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Nikon P520
Landscape photography with Sony H400
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3.2 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
not so great battery power (200 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
fairly wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Nikon P520
Vlogging with Sony H400
reasonably wide (24mm)
selfie friendly display
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (550 grams)
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
includes mic support
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
heavier than competitors in class (628g)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Nikon P520 vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix P520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1000mm (41.7x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.2" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.80 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 X 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 550 grams (1.21 pounds) | 628 grams (1.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 84 x 102mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.0") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | 300 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL5 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $380 | $268 |
