Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10
82 Imaging
37 Features
70 Overall
50
![Nikon Coolpix P7700 front Nikon Coolpix P7700 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-P7700/Nikon-P7700-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-XZ-10/Olympus-XZ-10-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 392g - 119 x 73 x 50mm
- Launched May 2013
- Replaced the Nikon P7100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Nikon P7700 versus Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the P7700 (12MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is fairly similar but the P7700 (1/1.7") and XZ-10 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The P7700 was introduced 4 months after the XZ-10 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the P7700 scores versus the XZ-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P7700 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are available at Nikon P7700 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7700 over the Olympus XZ-10
P7700 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Nikon P7700
XZ-10 | P7700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon P7700 and Olympus XZ-10
P7700 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | Similar age |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon P7700 provides outer measurements of 119mm x 73mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") and a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has proportions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P7700 versus Olympus XZ-10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the P7700 versus the XZ-10.
![Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-vs-Olympus-Stylus-XZ-10-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the P7700 and XZ-10 is 82 and 91 respectively.
![Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-vs-Olympus-Stylus-XZ-10-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The image below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the P7700 and XZ-10.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same resolution but not the same sensor dimensions. The P7700 uses the larger sensor which will make getting shallower DOF less difficult.
![Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-vs-Olympus-Stylus-XZ-10-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-vs-Olympus-Stylus-XZ-10-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P7700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P7700 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P7700 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-05-28 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 99 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | - |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 392 gr (0.86 lbs) | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 73 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 53 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 191 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 240 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL14 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $499 | $428 |