Panasonic GF2 vs Pentax Q10

Here is a in-depth comparison of the Panasonic GF2 versus Pentax Q10, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Panasonic and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the GF2 (12MP) and the Q10 (12MP) is very similar but the GF2 (Four Thirds) and Q10 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The GF2 was introduced 18 months before the Q10 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the GF2 grades against the Q10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 & Pentax Q10. The whole galleries are viewable at Panasonic GF2 Gallery & Pentax Q10 Gallery.

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Panasonic GF2 comes with physical dimensions of 113mm x 68mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 310 grams (0.68 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q10 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).

Look at the Panasonic GF2 versus Pentax Q10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the GF2 versus the Q10.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GF2 and Q10 is 88 and 92 respectively.

Usually, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GF2 and Q10.

As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical resolution but not the same sensor sizing. The GF2 provides the larger sensor which will make obtaining bokeh easier. The older GF2 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.