Nikon P7800 vs Nikon W300
82 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Nikon P7800 vs Nikon W300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 399g - 119 x 78 x 50mm
- Launched November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Released May 2017
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon P7800 vs Nikon W300 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Nikon P7800 versus Nikon W300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Nikon. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the P7800 (12MP) and W300 (16MP) and the P7800 (1/1.7") and W300 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe P7800 was revealed 4 years earlier than the W300 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the P7800 matches up against the W300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Nikon P7800 vs Nikon W300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P7800 & Nikon Coolpix W300. The full galleries are available at Nikon P7800 Gallery & Nikon W300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7800 over the Nikon W300
| P7800 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Nikon P7800
| W300 | P7800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 | November 2013 | More modern by 42 months |
Common features in the Nikon P7800 and Nikon W300
| P7800 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 921k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Nikon P7800 vs Nikon W300 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Nikon P7800 offers physical dimensions of 119mm x 78mm x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") along with a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs) whilst the Nikon W300 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon P7800 versus Nikon W300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the P7800 vs the W300.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the P7800 and W300 is 82 and 91 respectively.
Nikon P7800 vs Nikon W300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the P7800 and W300.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The P7800 having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Nikon W300 will resolve more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged P7800 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon P7800 vs Nikon W300 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon P7800 vs Nikon W300 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Nikon Coolpix W300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Nikon |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Nikon Coolpix W300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-11-25 | 2017-05-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | f/2.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 921 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 399g (0.88 lbs) | 231g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 78 x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 200 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 280 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Built-in |
| Battery ID | EN-EL14 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $550 | $387 |