Nikon P7800 vs Olympus 6020
82 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Nikon P7800 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 399g - 119 x 78 x 50mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
Nikon P7800 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Nikon P7800 vs Olympus 6020, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the P7800 (12MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is fairly close but the P7800 (1/1.7") and 6020 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe P7800 was unveiled 3 years later than the 6020 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the P7800 scores against the 6020 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon P7800 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P7800 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are available at Nikon P7800 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7800 over the Olympus 6020
P7800 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | February 2010 | More recent by 47 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Nikon P7800
6020 | P7800 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P7800 and Olympus 6020
P7800 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | No Touch display |
Nikon P7800 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Nikon P7800 comes with outer measurements of 119mm x 78mm x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") with a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Nikon P7800 vs Olympus 6020 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the P7800 and the 6020.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the P7800 and 6020 is 82 and 95 respectively.
Nikon P7800 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the P7800 and 6020.
To sum up, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The P7800 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus 6020 will result in greater detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger P7800 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Nikon P7800 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P7800 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-11-25 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 99 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 921k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 399 grams (0.88 lbs) | 122 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 78 x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 200 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL14 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $550 | $279 |