Clicky

Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
82
Imaging
38
Features
73
Overall
52
Nikon Coolpix P7800 front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
38
Features
33
Overall
36

Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Nikon P7800
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
  • 399g - 119 x 78 x 50mm
  • Launched November 2013
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Nikon P7800 versus Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the P7800 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the P7800 (1/1.7") and TG-320 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The P7800 was brought out 23 months later than the TG-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the P7800 scores versus the TG-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon P7800 over the Olympus TG-320

 P7800 TG-320 
IntroducedNovember 2013January 2012More recent by 23 months
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kSharper screen (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Nikon P7800

 TG-320 P7800 

Common features in the Nikon P7800 and Olympus TG-320

 P7800 TG-320 
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon P7800 features physical measurements of 119mm x 78mm x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Nikon P7800 versus Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the P7800 vs the TG-320.

Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the P7800 and TG-320 is 82 and 94 respectively.

Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison

Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the P7800 and TG-320.

Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The P7800 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-320 will resolve greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent P7800 provides an advantage in sensor tech.

Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison

Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon P7800 Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography information
46
has manual focus
includes face detection focus
delivers RAW files
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
34
MP count good (14MP)
includes face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Nikon P7800 Street photography features
Olympus TG-320 Street photography features
65
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
heavier than competitors in class (399g)
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competition (155 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Nikon P7800 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography highlights
44
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (350 per charge)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect auto focus
41
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
environment proofing
max fps low (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low battery life (150 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Nikon P7800 Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography highlights
68
better than average battery life (350 shots)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
relatively wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competitors in class (399 grams)
resolution not great (12MP)
67
lighter than competition (155 grams)
environment proofing
MP count good (14MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low battery life (150 shots)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Nikon P7800 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
58
has manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (350 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
39
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
low battery life (150 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon P7800 Vlogging info
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging info
75
relatively wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
selfie friendly display
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (399 grams)
32
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
lighter than competition (155 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic support
Photography Glossary

Nikon P7800 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon P7800 and Olympus TG-320
 Nikon Coolpix P7800Olympus TG-320
General Information
Manufacturer Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix P7800 Olympus TG-320
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2013-11-25 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 6400 -
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 99 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-200mm (7.1x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximum aperture f/2.0-4.0 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing distance 5cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 921k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 921k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 8.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 10.00 m 5.80 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Optional None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 399 gr (0.88 lbs) 155 gr (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 119 x 78 x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 54 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.2 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.7 not tested
DXO Low light rating 200 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos 150 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID EN-EL14 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (10 or 2 seconds) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $550 $0