Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5
82 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5865/b58658982e8e01305c4ba522531ad542256781ca" alt="Nikon Coolpix P7800 front Nikon Coolpix P7800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68076/68076f64aea446dc770a37f6b8beaf83f554abcb" alt="Ricoh CX5 front Ricoh CX5 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 399g - 119 x 78 x 50mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Nikon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the P7800 (12MP) and the CX5 (10MP) is very comparable but the P7800 (1/1.7") and CX5 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The P7800 was brought out 2 years after the CX5 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the P7800 matches up vs the CX5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P7800 and Ricoh CX5. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon P7800 Gallery and Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7800 over the Ricoh CX5
P7800 | CX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 29 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Nikon P7800
CX5 | P7800 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P7800 and Ricoh CX5
P7800 | CX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Nikon P7800 offers physical dimensions of 119mm x 78mm x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") along with a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs) while the Ricoh CX5 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the P7800 against the CX5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd06b/bd06b7eb28830ba64860680b0d4a2604ad83e9ba" alt="Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 size comparison Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the P7800 and CX5 is 82 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0befd/0befd511dc6ef499b7fa0840cfb6f2bd8753437a" alt="Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 top view buttons comparison Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The image here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the P7800 and CX5.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The P7800 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Nikon P7800 will produce more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent P7800 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b093/4b093af7ba5243c38ec317ffc17d0f774d35f4f0" alt="Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 sensor size comparison Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 sensor size comparison"
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1462d/1462d352a4d33911b4f1bd495dc45fc3ea57ed2b" alt="Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Ricoh CX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Ricoh CX5 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-11-25 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 99 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 921 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 399 gr (0.88 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 119 x 78 x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 200 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL14 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $550 | $399 |