Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-4
82 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 399g - 119 x 78 x 50mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Nikon P7800 versus Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the P7800 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the P7800 (1/1.7") and WG-4 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe P7800 was introduced 2 months prior to the WG-4 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the P7800 matches up against the WG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P7800 & Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon P7800 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7800 over the Ricoh WG-4
| P7800 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Nikon P7800
| WG-4 | P7800 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P7800 and Ricoh WG-4
| P7800 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 | February 2014 | Same age | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon P7800 features exterior measurements of 119mm x 78mm x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") and a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon P7800 versus Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the P7800 and the WG-4.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the P7800 and WG-4 is 82 and 90 respectively.
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The photograph below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the P7800 and WG-4.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The P7800 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Ricoh WG-4 will show more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon P7800 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-11-25 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 921k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 399 grams (0.88 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 78 x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 200 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL14 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $550 | $330 |