Nikon P7800 vs Samsung SL102
82 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Nikon P7800 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 399g - 119 x 78 x 50mm
- Revealed November 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Nikon P7800 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Nikon P7800 vs Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Nikon and Samsung. The image resolution of the P7800 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is very comparable but the P7800 (1/1.7") and SL102 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe P7800 was launched 4 years after the SL102 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the P7800 grades against the SL102 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon P7800 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P7800 & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon P7800 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P7800 over the Samsung SL102
P7800 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 60 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Nikon P7800
SL102 | P7800 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P7800 and Samsung SL102
P7800 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Nikon P7800 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Nikon P7800 provides external measurements of 119mm x 78mm x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") and a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Nikon P7800 vs Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the P7800 versus the SL102.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the P7800 and SL102 is 82 and 96 respectively.
Nikon P7800 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out technical specs. The picture below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the P7800 and SL102.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The P7800 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Nikon P7800 will provide more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher P7800 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon P7800 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P7800 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Samsung |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix P7800 | Samsung SL102 |
Alternative name | - | ES55 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-11-25 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 99 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.0 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 921 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | - |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 399 gr (0.88 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 78 x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 200 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL14 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $550 | $130 |