Nikon P80 vs Olympus VR-320
75 Imaging
33 Features
33 Overall
33


94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Nikon P80 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 405g - 110 x 79 x 78mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Successor is Nikon P90
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330

Nikon P80 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a in-depth assessment of the Nikon P80 versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the P80 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The P80 was introduced 3 years earlier than the VR-320 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Nikon P80 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the P80 scores versus the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Nikon P80 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P80 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon P80 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P80 over the Olympus VR-320
P80 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon P80
VR-320 | P80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Nikon P80 and Olympus VR-320
P80 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Nikon P80 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Nikon P80 provides physical dimensions of 110mm x 79mm x 78mm (4.3" x 3.1" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P80 versus Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the P80 vs the VR-320.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the P80 and VR-320 is 75 and 94 respectively.

Nikon P80 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The visual below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the P80 and VR-320.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to give you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images way more aggressively. The older P80 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Nikon P80 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon P80 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P80 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix P80 | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-486mm (18.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.0 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480, 15/30 fps, 320 x 240, 15 fps, 160 x 120, 15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 405g (0.89 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 79 x 78mm (4.3" x 3.1" x 3.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | EN-EL5 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $400 | $179 |