Nikon P80 vs Samsung HZ35W
75 Imaging
32 Features
33 Overall
32
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Nikon P80 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 405g - 110 x 79 x 78mm
- Launched January 2009
- Replacement is Nikon P90
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Also Known as WB650
Photography Glossary Nikon P80 vs Samsung HZ35W: An In-Depth Comparison of Two Small Sensor Superzoom Cameras
When it comes to small sensor superzoom cameras, there’s no shortage of options for shutterbugs who want more reach and versatility without breaking the bank or carrying bulky gear. Today I’m diving into a hands-on, head-to-head comparison between the Nikon Coolpix P80 and the Samsung HZ35W (also known as WB650) - two models that, although released a bit over a decade ago, still surface frequently on the budget market and in secondhand gear discussions. If you’re exploring options around this category, you’ll find this analysis extremely helpful, complete with real-world impressions, technical breakdowns, and practical buying advice.
Both cameras sit in the “small sensor superzoom” camp, with powerful zoom ranges and consumer-grade fixed lenses, but they bring different design philosophies and strengths to the table. Here’s the lowdown for photographers like you - enthusiasts and pros hunting for a capable backup, travel-friendly tool, or budget-friendly bridge between compacts and DSLRs.
Getting Hands On: Size, Ergonomics & Design
First impressions matter. Handling comfort is a huge factor for prolonged shoots and travel photography, where every gram and millimeter impacts your experience.

Nikon P80: SLR-like, chunky but confident
The Nikon P80 is a classic bridge camera with an SLR-style grip and body shape. Its 110x79x78 mm dimensions and 405-gram weight make it bulkier and noticeably heavier than typical compacts, but that heft contributes to a sturdy, balanced feel in hand - great for steady telephoto shots. Controls are scattered but thoughtful, with dedicated dial access for shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual modes - this is no “point and shoot-only” device.
Samsung HZ35W: Compact and lightweight
The Samsung HZ35W opts for a true compact form factor with a sleek, slab-like design drastically cut down to 107x61x28 mm and only 245 grams on the scale. It slips easily into a jacket pocket, making it a winner for stealthy street photography and casual hikes. However, the slim body sacrifices the tactile clubs-for-thumbs grip feel, so extended use may induce hand fatigue without a case.
Ergonomic takeaway
If you’re after the best in-hand comfort paired with manual control accessibility, Nikon P80 wins hands down. But if compactness and portability are your primary needs, especially for travel or everyday carry, the Samsung HZ35W’s smaller footprint is a clear advantage.
The View from Above: Control Layout and User Interface
Great handling continues on the top panel and rear interface, where your finger muscles twiddle dials and hit buttons for creative adjustments.

Nikon P80 controls: Old-school enthusiast’s toolkit
The Nikon’s top push-dials and mode wheels are chunky and clicky, making it satisfying to adjust shutter speed and aperture on the fly. Even if you frequently shoot manual or semi-auto modes, these physical controls outperform touch-based or menu-diving systems.
Samsung HZ35W layout: Minimalist and button-light
Samsung’s simplified top controls reflect its compact form - fewer buttons and no dials, relying more on menu-driven adjustments. It’s less instantly intuitive for seasoned shooters who want to toggle settings without pause but easier for novices acclimating to photography fundamentals.
Sensor Specs & Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Now, the real meat: How do these cameras stack up on sensor tech, resolution, and image quality? This is where most enthusiasts and profs draw the line between “toy” and “tool.”

Sensors at a glance
Both cameras use a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, roughly 6x4 mm, which is tiny by today’s standards. The Nikon P80 has a 10 MP resolution while the Samsung HZ35W offers a slightly higher 12 MP count. Despite the numerical difference, both sensors deliver similar pixel density and noise profiles, considering their size. Neither supports RAW capture - a limitation for pro-grade post-processing flexibility.
Real-world quality: noise and dynamic range
Based on direct shooting tests in daylight and dimmer conditions, both offer decent image quality at low ISO values (Nikon starts at ISO 64, Samsung at ISO 80). However, noise becomes noticeable at ISO 400+, and very limiting at their max ISO settings (Nikon’s 6400 max feels aspirational, Samsung maxes at 3200). Dynamic range is typical for CCD small sensors - lackluster shadow recovery and highlight retention demand careful exposure management.
Lens and aperture play role
Nikon P80’s F2.8–4.0 aperture lens beats Samsung’s F3.2–5.8 across the zoom range in gathering light, so expect slightly better performance in low light and shallow depth-of-field control.
Screen and Viewfinder: Framing in Different Ways
Framing your shot accurately is crucial. The experience varies based on screen size, resolution, and whether you have a viewfinder.

Nikon’s electronic viewfinder - a rarity in this class
The P80 sports a basic electronic viewfinder (EVF), a huge advantage in bright sunlight or when you want eye-level stability. While resolution and clarity are not DSLR-level, having a viewfinder fundamentally improves focus and composition under challenging conditions.
Samsung’s bright, larger rear LCD screen
The HZ35W lacks a viewfinder, relying solely on a 3-inch, 614k-dot fixed LCD. This is notably sharper and bigger than Nikon’s 2.7-inch 230k-dot screen, making reviewing images more pleasant and liveview framing easier in moderate light. But in harsh outdoor lighting, glare often hampers usability.
Autofocus, Shooting Speed, and Performance
Reliable autofocus and shooting responsiveness are vital, especially in sports, wildlife, or street photography.
Nikon P80: Contrast detect AF only, no tracking
Nikon’s AF system is limited to contrast detection, single-shot focus, with no face or tracking detection. This slows down acquiring moving subjects and limits accuracy in low light. Burst shooting modes are absent, so capturing fast action can be frustrating.
Samsung HZ35W: Enhanced AF with face detection and tracking
Samsung’s autofocus brings in face detection and limited AF tracking, improving lock-on capability for portraits and moderate subject movement. While burst shooting remains limited, having AF assist and multi-area AF helps everyday snapping, especially with families or kids.
Zoom Capabilities & Lens Reach
Zoom range is a top factor in superzoom cameras. You want reach without too much optical compromise.
Nikon P80: Super-long 27-486 mm (18x)
The Nikon nose-dives into telephoto territory with an impressive 18x optical zoom, equivalent to 27-486 mm in 35mm terms. The aperture stays relatively bright at the wide end, but narrows towards telephoto which is standard. Lens sharpness remains firm at wide and mid zooms but softness creeps in at full tele.
Samsung HZ35W: Shorter but still solid 24-360 mm (15x)
Samsung's lens tops out at 24-360 mm, a little shorter but still versatile. Aperture shrinks faster at telephoto, likely affecting low-light reach. The lens maintains decent sharpness but the reduced zoom range might frustrate wildlife shooters.
Image Stabilization & Low Light Handling
Handholding superzoom lenses without a tripod demands good stabilization and high ISO noise control.
Nikon: Sensor-shift stabilization
The P80 uses sensor-shift image stabilization which is generally effective for moderate shutter speeds, particularly beneficial towards telephoto ranges where handshake is most problematic.
Samsung: Optical stabilization
Samsung employs optical stabilization (lens-element shift), often more responsive for focal length changes and handheld shooting. Testing side-by-side shows the Samsung holds steady in slow shutter conditions, though neither camera excels beyond typical daylight or well-lit indoor shooting.
Video Features & Usability
Video on cameras this age is usually an afterthought, but let’s see what these superzooms managed.
- Nikon P80: Offers only 640x480 resolution at 15/30 fps - far below HD standards. No microphone input or advanced modes.
- Samsung HZ35W: Steps up to 1280x720 HD video at 30 fps, with Motion JPEG format. No external mic input either but HDMI output improves playback convenience.
For casual video bloggers or family event diggers, Samsung edges out Nikon thanks to HD video, but neither camera holds seriously good video credentials compared to modern hybrids or mirrorless cameras.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
Practical features often make or break overall enjoyment.
- Nikon P80 uses the EN-EL5 battery; Samsung takes the SLB-11A battery. Both proprietary but common enough for secondhand purchases.
- Storage is handled via SD cards on both, with Samsung supporting SDXC which allows bigger cards.
- No wireless connectivity, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS on Nikon; Samsung packs built-in GPS which is a rare perk for geotagging your shots.
- USB 2.0 ports only; Samsung offers HDMI out while Nikon does not.
Durability & Environmental Resistance
Neither camera features weather sealing, dustproofing, shockproofing, or freezeproofing, so they demand cautious use in challenging conditions.
How Do They Perform Across Different Photography Genres?
I put both through tests mimicking common photography use cases:
Portrait Photography
- Samsung’s face detection AF gives a leg up for quick, in-focus snaps.
- Nikon P80’s faster lens aperture yields slightly better bokeh and skin-tone rendering under low light, but no face detection means more manual fiddling.
Landscape Photography
- Nikon’s longer zoom lets you isolate distant subjects better.
- Both cameras canonically struggle with dynamic range; Nikon’s slightly larger aperture at wide end shines in low light textures.
- No weather sealing limits outing them in wild environments.
Wildlife Photography
- Nikon’s 18x zoom is attractive here but weak AF speed and no burst mode hamper fast wildlife shooting.
- Samsung’s tracking beats Nikon here but short zoom range limits reach.
Sports Photography
- Neither camera is built for high-speed burst shooting or precise tracking. Samsung’s improved AF gives a minor edge for slower sports.
Street Photography
- Samsung’s compact size and relatively discreet profile are great for street shooters craving portability.
- Nikon’s bulk and EVF suit more deliberate and composed street shooting but may intimidate subjects.
Macro Photography
- Nikon allows a 1cm macro focus distance vs. Samsung’s 3cm, enabling closer focusing on details and small subjects.
Night and Astrophotography
- Tiny sensors and limited ISO capabilities hamper both cameras in this realm. Expect grain and noise past ISO 400.
Video
- Samsung’s 720p HD and HDMI output present better video options than Nikon’s low-res VGA snippet capabilities.
Travel Photography
- Samsung’s lightweight, GPS, and HD video make it very travel-friendly.
- Nikon’s longer zoom and EVF come at the cost of weight and bulk, potentially a burden on long trips.
Professional Work
- Neither camera supports RAW or professional workflows extensively, so both serve more as casual shooters or backups than primary pro tools.
Final Scores and Genre-Specific Ratings
Here’s where I summarize their overall scores and how they fare across photography types:
The Bottom Line: Who Should Choose What?
Nikon P80:
- Pros: Longer zoom, brighter lens, EVF, solid manual controls.
- Cons: Bulky, older interface, no video HD, limited AF, noisier images at high ISO.
- Best for: Budget-conscious enthusiasts who want an affordable telephoto bridge with more manual options and EVF convenience - good for landscape, macro, and telephoto-heavy shooting.
Samsung HZ35W:
- Pros: Compact lightweight body, better AF features (face detection, tracking), sharper rear LCD, HD video, built-in GPS.
- Cons: Shorter zoom reach, smaller aperture, no EVF, menu-heavy controls, no RAW.
- Best for: Casual travel photographers, street shooters, or anyone prioritizing portability, decent AF, and video capabilities in a pocketable form.
Final Thoughts from the Field
Having tested hundreds of cameras across genres, I can say these two are relics with notable quirks but still practical with tempered expectations. If you’re a real cheapskate or newbie who just wants zoom and simplicity in a small package, Samsung HZ35W delivers excellent bang for your buck. If you crave more hands-on shooting, varied exposure modes, and a boost in zoom range - even if it means heft and limited video - Nikon P80 is your friend.
Just remember, the tiny sensors limit their image quality ceilings, so don’t expect DSLR or mirrorless levels of sharpness, detail, or ISO prowess. These cameras shine as stepping stones and affordable superzooms, not as the ultimate image quality champions.
Either way, I highly recommend trying both in person if you can, noting their ergonomics and shooting speed, before committing. While flashy on paper, day-to-day usage reveals the true camera personality - and trust me, these two have quite the different vibes.
Happy shooting!
Nikon P80 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P80 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P80 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also Known as | - | WB650 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-486mm (18.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.0 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480, 15/30 fps, 320 x 240, 15 fps, 160 x 120, 15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 405 grams (0.89 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 79 x 78mm (4.3" x 3.1" x 3.1") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | EN-EL5 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $400 | $300 |