Clicky

Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
52
Imaging
40
Features
63
Overall
49
Nikon Coolpix P900 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
35
Overall
35

Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Nikon P900
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 899g - 140 x 103 x 137mm
  • Revealed March 2015
  • Renewed by Nikon P1000
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Lets look closer at the Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the P900 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The P900 was released 3 years after the VR-320 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Nikon P900 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the P900 scores versus the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Nikon P900 over the Olympus VR-320

 P900 VR-320 
AnnouncedMarch 2015July 2011Newer by 45 months
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution921k230kClearer screen (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon P900

 VR-320 P900 

Common features in the Nikon P900 and Olympus VR-320

 P900 VR-320 
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon P900 has got exterior measurements of 140mm x 103mm x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") along with a weight of 899 grams (1.98 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Examine the Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the P900 and the VR-320.

Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the P900 and VR-320 is 52 and 94 respectively.

Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The picture underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the P900 and VR-320.

Plainly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Nikon P900 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger P900 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Nikon P900
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
44
has manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
33
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
features face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Nikon P900 Street photography information
Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
45
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than average (899g)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Nikon P900
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
55
amazing zoom range (24-2000mm 83.3 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
has tracking focus
good battery power (360 shots)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
46
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Nikon P900 Travel photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography highlights
59
good battery power (360 per charge)
supports bluetooth
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (2000mm)
heavier than average (899g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than average in class (158g)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Nikon P900 Landscape photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography advice
51
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
good battery power (360 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
41
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon P900 Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging advice
53
rather wide (24mm)
selfie friendly display
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of mic socket
heavier than average (899g)
32
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
lighter than average in class (158g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon P900 and Olympus VR-320
 Nikon Coolpix P900Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company Nikon Olympus
Model Nikon Coolpix P900 Olympus VR-320
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2015-03-02 2011-07-19
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Expeed C2 TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Max boosted ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-2000mm (83.3x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 921 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 921 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 7.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) 4.70 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p) 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Yes None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 899 gr (1.98 pounds) 158 gr (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 103 x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model EN-EL23 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $600 $179