Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320
52 Imaging
40 Features
63 Overall
49
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 899g - 140 x 103 x 137mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Renewed by Nikon P1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Lets look closer at the Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the P900 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe P900 was released 3 years after the VR-320 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Nikon P900 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the P900 scores versus the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P900 and Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon P900 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P900 over the Olympus VR-320
| P900 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2015 | July 2011 | Newer by 45 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon P900
| VR-320 | P900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P900 and Olympus VR-320
| P900 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon P900 has got exterior measurements of 140mm x 103mm x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") along with a weight of 899 grams (1.98 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the P900 and the VR-320.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the P900 and VR-320 is 52 and 94 respectively.
Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The picture underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the P900 and VR-320.
Plainly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Nikon P900 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger P900 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon P900 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P900 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P900 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2015-03-02 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 921 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p) 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 899 gr (1.98 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 103 x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL23 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $179 |