Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ200
52 Imaging
41 Features
63 Overall
49
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 899g - 140 x 103 x 137mm
- Announced March 2015
- Refreshed by Nikon P1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Announced July 2012
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ100
- Updated by Panasonic FZ300
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Nikon and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the P900 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe P900 was revealed 2 years later than the FZ200 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the P900 grades versus the FZ200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P900 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The full galleries are provided at Nikon P900 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P900 over the Panasonic FZ200
P900 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2015 | July 2012 | Fresher by 32 months | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Nikon P900
FZ200 | P900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P900 and Panasonic FZ200
P900 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon P900 comes with outside dimensions of 140mm x 103mm x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") having a weight of 899 grams (1.98 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the P900 versus the FZ200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the P900 and FZ200 is 52 and 65 respectively.
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the P900 and FZ200.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Nikon P900 to show extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger P900 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P900 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Panasonic |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-03-02 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed C2 | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 921 thousand dots | 1,312 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 13.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p) 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 899 gr (1.98 lbs) | 588 gr (1.30 lbs) |
Dimensions | 140 x 103 x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 540 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL23 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $600 | $499 |