Nikon P900 vs Samsung WB250F
52 Imaging
41 Features
63 Overall
49
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Nikon P900 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 899g - 140 x 103 x 137mm
- Launched March 2015
- Later Model is Nikon P1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon P900 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Nikon P900 versus Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Samsung. The resolution of the P900 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very well matched and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe P900 was introduced 2 years later than the WB250F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Nikon P900 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the P900 matches up vs the WB250F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon P900 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P900 & Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon P900 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P900 over the Samsung WB250F
| P900 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2015 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 27 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Nikon P900
| WB250F | P900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon P900 and Samsung WB250F
| P900 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Nikon P900 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon P900 provides external measurements of 140mm x 103mm x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") with a weight of 899 grams (1.98 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Nikon P900 versus Samsung WB250F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the P900 and the WB250F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the P900 and WB250F is 52 and 93 respectively.
Nikon P900 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The photograph here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the P900 and WB250F.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon P900 to resolve more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger P900 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon P900 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Nikon P900 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P900 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix P900 | Samsung WB250F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2015-03-02 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 921k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 921k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p) 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 899 gr (1.98 pounds) | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 140 x 103 x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL23 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $600 | $250 |
