Nikon P950 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Nikon P950 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Launched January 2020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Superseded the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Nikon P950 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Nikon P950 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the P950 (16MP) and the SP-810 UZ (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe P950 was announced 8 years later than the SP-810 UZ and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the P950 matches up against the SP-810 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon P950 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P950 and Olympus SP-810 UZ. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon P950 Gallery and Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
P950 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2020 | July 2011 | More recent by 103 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Nikon P950
SP-810 UZ | P950 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P950 and Olympus SP-810 UZ
P950 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P950 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon P950 enjoys physical measurements of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") accompanied by a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs) while the Olympus SP-810 UZ has measurements of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon P950 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the P950 versus the SP-810 UZ.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the P950 and SP-810 UZ is 52 and 78 respectively.
Nikon P950 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by checking specs. The visual below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the P950 and SP-810 UZ.
All in all, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Nikon P950 to give greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The newer P950 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon P950 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P950 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P950 | Olympus SP-810 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P950 | Olympus SP-810 UZ |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2020-01-07 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 24-864mm (36.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.9-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 90 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 300 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 0.7fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.20 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1005 gr (2.22 lbs) | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $797 | $280 |