Nikon P950 vs Ricoh CX4
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Nikon P950 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Revealed January 2020
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon P950 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Nikon P950 and Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Nikon and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the P950 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe P950 was released 9 years later than the CX4 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Nikon P950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the P950 matches up vs the CX4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon P950 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P950 & Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are available at Nikon P950 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Ricoh CX4
| P950 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2020 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 115 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.2" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Nikon P950
| CX4 | P950 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P950 and Ricoh CX4
| P950 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Nikon P950 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon P950 offers external dimensions of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") along with a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon P950 and Ricoh CX4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the P950 and the CX4.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the P950 and CX4 is 52 and 92 respectively.
Nikon P950 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specifications. The visual here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the P950 and CX4.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Nikon P950 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The newer P950 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon P950 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon P950 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P950 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix P950 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2020-01-07 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 90 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 1005g (2.22 lb) | 205g (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $797 | $211 |