Nikon S02 vs Olympus E-420
97 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
Nikon S02 vs Olympus E-420 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 100g - 77 x 51 x 18mm
- Revealed September 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched June 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-410
Nikon S02 vs Olympus E-420 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Nikon S02 and Olympus E-420, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the S02 (13MP) and E-420 (10MP) and the S02 (1/3") and E-420 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S02 was introduced 5 years later than the E-420 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Nikon S02 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the S02 matches up versus the E-420 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon S02 vs Olympus E-420 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S02 and Olympus E-420. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S02 Gallery and Olympus E-420 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S02 over the Olympus E-420
S02 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2013 | June 2008 | More recent by 64 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Nikon S02
E-420 | S02 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Nikon S02 and Olympus E-420
S02 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Nikon S02 vs Olympus E-420 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S02 has got outside dimensions of 77mm x 51mm x 18mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-420 has measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S02 and Olympus E-420 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the S02 vs the E-420.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S02 and E-420 is 97 and 77 respectively.
Nikon S02 vs Olympus E-420 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The photograph below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S02 and E-420.
To sum up, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S02 using its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Nikon S02 will resolve extra detail using its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher S02 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S02 vs Olympus E-420 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S02 vs Olympus E-420 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S02 | Olympus E-420 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S02 | Olympus E-420 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-09-05 | 2008-06-23 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 17.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 3 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 45 |
Crop factor | 7.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 1.40 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps); High-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100 gr (0.22 pounds) | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 77 x 51 x 18mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 56 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 527 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photographs | 500 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Card slots | - | Single |
Pricing at release | $177 | $999 |