Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860
97 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1c23/b1c2300026db98584c76d7c57a0dcc8ab11ab7ad" alt="Nikon Coolpix S02 front Nikon Coolpix S02 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 100g - 77 x 51 x 18mm
- Announced September 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
- New Model is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Nikon S02 versus Olympus TG-860, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S02 (13MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is very similar but the S02 (1/3") and TG-860 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The S02 was manufactured 17 months prior to the TG-860 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the S02 scores versus the TG-860 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S02 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The entire galleries are available at Nikon S02 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S02 over the Olympus TG-860
S02 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Nikon S02
TG-860 | S02 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | September 2013 | More modern by 17 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S02 and Olympus TG-860
S02 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S02 comes with outer measurements of 77mm x 51mm x 18mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S02 versus Olympus TG-860 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the S02 against the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bb85/7bb8588fc298188b9710e94d07a178214717f7e1" alt="Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S02 and TG-860 is 97 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af21e/af21e54a6d0e14127e55e6692799441194ad7e2c" alt="Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specs. The picture here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S02 and TG-860.
All in all, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The S02 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Olympus TG-860 will offer greater detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged S02 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/628e9/628e9c7bce0478fe8bb208d4f00ccfcb22d02c25" alt="Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8c12/b8c12d1197945a58771a0aa4f4bffcb713a4d05d" alt="Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Nikon S02 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S02 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S02 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-09-05 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 1.40 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps); High-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 100 gr (0.22 pounds) | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 77 x 51 x 18mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Built-in | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | - | Single |
Retail price | $177 | $279 |