Clicky

Nikon S220 vs Sony W320

Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Nikon Coolpix S220 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Nikon S220 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Nikon S220
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Nikon S220 vs Sony W320 Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Nikon S220 versus Sony W320, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the S220 (10MP) and W320 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The S220 was revealed 11 months earlier than the W320 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the S220 matches up against the W320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Sony W320

 S220 W320 

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Nikon S220

 W320 S220 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010February 2009More modern by 11 months
Screen size2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Nikon S220 and Sony W320

 S220 W320 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Nikon S220 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon S220 features external dimensions of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has sizing of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check out the Nikon S220 versus Sony W320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the S220 versus the W320.

Nikon S220 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S220 and W320 is 97 and 97 respectively.

Nikon S220 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S220 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S220 and W320.

As you can tell, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Sony W320 to show more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged S220 will be behind in sensor tech.

Nikon S220 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Nikon S220 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S220 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S220 Portrait photography factors
Sony W320 Portrait photography factors
19
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
28
megapixel count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Nikon S220 Street photography details
Sony W320 Street photography details
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
49
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Nikon S220 Sports photography factors
Sony W320 Sports photography factors
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
26
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Nikon S220 Travel photography features
Sony W320 Travel photography features
52
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
66
megapixel count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S220 Landscape photography highlights
Sony W320 Landscape photography highlights
22
no manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
33
really wide (26mm)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7")
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S220 Vlogging advice
Sony W320 Vlogging advice
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
26
really wide (26mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Nikon S220 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S220 and Sony W320
 Nikon Coolpix S220Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Company Nikon Sony
Model Nikon Coolpix S220 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-02-03 2010-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 2000 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance 10cm 4cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 1 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 11.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 100g (0.22 pounds) 117g (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model EN-EL10 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (3 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $56 $269