Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1
97 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14c26/14c26813ba805670eb48a77334820e84b88d961f" alt="Nikon Coolpix S220 front Nikon Coolpix S220 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32ca4/32ca40af2812a9ed5cee040be6ce621ea3edee54" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 front"
96 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2000
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
- Released February 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 149g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Launched August 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Nikon S220 and Sony WX1, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Nikon and Sony. The image resolution of the S220 (10MP) and the WX1 (10MP) is pretty similar but the S220 (1/2.3") and WX1 (1/2.4") enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The S220 was manufactured 6 months before the WX1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the S220 matches up vs the WX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S220 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S220 Gallery & Sony WX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Sony WX1
S220 | WX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony WX1 over the Nikon S220
WX1 | S220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Nikon S220 and Sony WX1
S220 | WX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2009 | ![]() | August 2009 | Similar age |
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S220 comes with outside dimensions of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) and the Sony WX1 has dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S220 and Sony WX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the S220 versus the WX1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c5ba/5c5ba52a10b10fc93f5188430b79b7be2a59097d" alt="Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 size comparison Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the S220 and WX1 is 97 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7791c/7791c333d63825c5757cc4e8375207e61c8f8521" alt="Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 top view buttons comparison Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S220 and WX1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The S220 has the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF simpler.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0595d/0595dc6e9c462f93b34b8371ac662dd42dd3d089" alt="Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 sensor size comparison Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 sensor size comparison"
Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d3fc/7d3fcc9347f1c7c62cb63c0888995ff328edadc8" alt="Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Nikon S220 vs Sony WX1 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S220 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Sony |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S220 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-02-03 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 2000 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.4-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100 gr (0.22 pounds) | 149 gr (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | EN-EL10 | - |
Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $56 | $149 |