Nikon S2900 vs Samsung TL320
96 Imaging
46 Features
32 Overall
40
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Nikon S2900 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
- 119g - 95 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2015
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Also referred to as WB1000
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Nikon S2900 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Nikon S2900 vs Samsung TL320, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Nikon and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the S2900 (20MP) and TL320 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S2900 was revealed 5 years after the TL320 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the S2900 scores versus the TL320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Nikon S2900 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S2900 & Samsung TL320. The full galleries are available at Nikon S2900 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S2900 over the Samsung TL320
| S2900 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2015 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 72 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Nikon S2900
| TL320 | S2900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S2900 and Samsung TL320
| S2900 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Nikon S2900 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S2900 has external measurements of 95mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 119 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has proportions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon S2900 vs Samsung TL320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the S2900 against the TL320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S2900 and TL320 is 96 and 98 respectively.
Nikon S2900 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by going through specifications. The picture underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S2900 and TL320.
Plainly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Nikon S2900 to show greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger S2900 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S2900 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S2900 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S2900 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S2900 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also called as | - | WB1000 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2015-01-14 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-6.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 119 gr (0.26 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 59 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $117 | $380 |
