Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-860
90 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Nikon S32 and Olympus TG-860, both Waterproof cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S32 (13MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is relatively comparable but the S32 (1/3") and TG-860 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S32 was brought out 12 months prior to the TG-860 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Nikon S32 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the S32 scores vs the TG-860 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S32 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S32 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Olympus TG-860
| S32 | TG-860 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Nikon S32
| TG-860 | S32 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | February 2014 | More modern by 12 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S32 and Olympus TG-860
| S32 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon S32 comes with exterior dimensions of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Nikon S32 and Olympus TG-860 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the S32 against the TG-860.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the S32 and TG-860 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The image below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S32 and TG-860.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The S32 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Olympus TG-860 will produce more detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged S32 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S32 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S32 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S32 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2014-02-07 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lb) | 224 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | 300 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $180 | $279 |