Nikon S32 vs Olympus VG-160
90 Imaging
36 Features
23 Overall
30
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Nikon S32 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S32 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Nikon S32 vs Olympus VG-160, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S32 (13MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very well matched but the S32 (1/3") and VG-160 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S32 was revealed 2 years after the VG-160 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the S32 scores against the VG-160 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Nikon S32 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S32 & Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are available at Nikon S32 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Olympus VG-160
| S32 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Nikon S32
| VG-160 | S32 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Nikon S32 and Olympus VG-160
| S32 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Nikon S32 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Nikon S32 has external dimensions of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S32 vs Olympus VG-160 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the S32 vs the VG-160.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S32 and VG-160 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Nikon S32 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S32 and VG-160.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S32 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus VG-160 will give you greater detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher S32 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Nikon S32 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S32 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S32 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S32 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-02-07 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | 165 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $180 | $90 |