Nikon S32 vs Samsung WB700
90 Imaging
35 Features
23 Overall
30
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Nikon S32 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 30-90mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 175g - 108 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released December 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S32 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Nikon S32 and Samsung WB700, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Samsung. The resolution of the S32 (13MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is pretty similar but the S32 (1/3") and WB700 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S32 was introduced 3 years after the WB700 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the S32 scores against the WB700 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S32 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S32 & Samsung WB700. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S32 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S32 over the Samsung WB700
| S32 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | December 2010 | More modern by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Nikon S32
| WB700 | S32 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S32 and Samsung WB700
| S32 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Nikon S32 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon S32 enjoys exterior measurements of 108mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S32 and Samsung WB700 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the S32 compared to the WB700.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S32 and WB700 is 90 and 98 respectively.
Nikon S32 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by reviewing technical specs. The image below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S32 and WB700.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The S32 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung WB700 will offer you greater detail using its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The younger S32 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Nikon S32 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S32 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S32 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S32 | Samsung WB700 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-02-07 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Highest resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | - |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 30-90mm (3.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920x1080 (30p), VGA 640x480 (30p, 15p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 66 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (Approx. 10 seconds ) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $180 | $300 |