Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1
96 Imaging
38 Features
32 Overall
35
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 128g - 95 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Nikon S3300 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the S3300 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S3300 was unveiled 3 years before the WG-M1 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the S3300 scores against the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S3300 and Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are available at Nikon S3300 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S3300 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| S3300 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Nikon S3300
| WG-M1 | S3300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 | February 2012 | Fresher by 31 months |
Common features in the Nikon S3300 and Ricoh WG-M1
| S3300 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon S3300 offers physical measurements of 95mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Nikon S3300 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the S3300 against the WG-M1.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the S3300 and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The graphic below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S3300 and WG-M1.
To sum up, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Nikon S3300 to produce extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older S3300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-02-01 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 128 gr (0.28 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 58 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 350 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $99 | $2,000 |