Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
![Nikon Coolpix S3300 front Nikon Coolpix S3300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300/Nikon-S3300-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-M1/Ricoh-WG-M1-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 128g - 95 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Nikon S3300 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the S3300 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The S3300 was unveiled 3 years before the WG-M1 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the S3300 scores against the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S3300 and Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are available at Nikon S3300 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S3300 over the Ricoh WG-M1
S3300 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Nikon S3300
WG-M1 | S3300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 31 months |
Common features in the Nikon S3300 and Ricoh WG-M1
S3300 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon S3300 offers physical measurements of 95mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Nikon S3300 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the S3300 against the WG-M1.
![Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Ricoh-WG-M1-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the S3300 and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.
![Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Ricoh-WG-M1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The graphic below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S3300 and WG-M1.
To sum up, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Nikon S3300 to produce extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older S3300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Ricoh-WG-M1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Ricoh-WG-M1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-02-01 | 2014-09-12 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | (1×) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 1.5 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 115k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 128 gr (0.28 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 58 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 shots | 350 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $99 | $2,000 |