Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
![Nikon Coolpix S3300 front Nikon Coolpix S3300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300/Nikon-S3300-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S930/Sony-S930-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-156mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 128g - 95 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 320 x 240 video
- 38-108mm (F2.9-5.4) lens
- 167g - 90 x 61 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Nikon S3300 and Sony S930, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the S3300 (16MP) and S930 (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The S3300 was introduced 3 years later than the S930 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the S3300 scores versus the S930 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S3300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S3300 Gallery & Sony S930 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S3300 over the Sony S930
S3300 | S930 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 38 months |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 112k | Clearer screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S930 over the Nikon S3300
S930 | S3300 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S3300 and Sony S930
S3300 | S930 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon S3300 features outer measurements of 95mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony S930 has measurements of 90mm x 61mm x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S3300 and Sony S930 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the S3300 and the S930.
![Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 size comparison Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S930-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S3300 and S930 is 96 and 94 respectively.
![Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 top view buttons comparison Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S930-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The visual here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S3300 and S930.
As you have seen, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Nikon S3300 to resolve extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern S3300 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
![Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 sensor size comparison Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S930-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-S3300-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S930-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon S3300 vs Sony S930 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Sony |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S3300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-02-01 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-156mm (6.0x) | 38-108mm (2.8x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.5 | f/2.9-5.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.4" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 112 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Syncro, No Flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 320x240 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 128 gr (0.28 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 58 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 90 x 61 x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / PRo-HG Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $99 | $219 |